Biden on the trapeze and the world on the tightrope
Victor Angelo
Much
of what is decided in the circle of power in Washington has a global impact,
whether you like it or not. I apologise for starting this text with this banal
observation. But it is a fact that American policy continues to weigh more
heavily than any other in international strategic and economic relations. So,
with the entry into office of the Biden administration, the international scene
has begun a new chapter. It is a profound change of course in a positive and
democratic sense. For the time being, it heralds the hope of a calming of the
tensions created over the last four years and which have put the dynamics among
the world's major players on a potentially explosive level. The dialogue should
replace the policy of confrontation and the abuse of force.
But
we are living in a time of great questioning. The mobilisation of tens of
thousands of paramilitaries to ensure the tranquillity of the ceremony for the
new president to take office is a clear indication of the seriousness of the
internal contradictions that exist in American society. Joe Biden has a
balancing act waiting for him. He knows that the hostility fomented by his predecessor
and amplified by several leaders who sit in Congress or by commentators who
appear on certain television channels, is fierce. It is even more dangerous
because it has generated in the minds of many fanatics a demonisation of their
opponents. In the sick logic of some of these crazy people, the next step is
violent action, trying to take any opportunity to shoot to kill democracy. This
possibility is a risk that the Secret Service will have to consider on a
permanent basis.
In
seeking a broader view of what might happen following this turning point, I
note that no one can convincingly predict the contours of what lies ahead. It
can only be said that the world of tomorrow will be different from what we have
known so far. Anyone who thinks that everything will return to where we were in
2019, before the pandemic, or in 2016, before Donald Trump's presidency, can
only dream of the past.
The
chapter that now opens combines a certain amount of optimism with a long list
of uncertainties. On the eve of Biden's inauguration, I took part in an
international discussion on the prospects and challenges ahead for the coming
years, and there was no clarity of ideas. Anyone who looks to the future with
intellectual honesty can identify a number of clues, but in the end, has to
confess that everything is uncertain and hazy.
The
only points of agreement concern the coronavirus pandemic. First, we all accept
that the pandemic is a huge challenge, which conditions everything else. It
must therefore be treated as the priority of priorities. This requires an
exceptional mobilisation of political attention and all necessary means. The
second area of agreement is on the imperative of international cooperation.
Countries in the North and South, as we euphemistically put it, must all
collaborate to make vaccines accessible to each person. The fight against covid
must be a bridge of union and cooperation between peoples, not a line of major
fracture. It would be a tragedy of incalculable consequences to emerge from
this crisis with a world even more divided between rich and poor, and
unfortunately, this possibility exists. Thirdly, there is also agreement on the
duration of the crisis. We cannot entertain the illusion that everything will
be resolved within months. The logistical issues, the financial difficulties,
and the shortcomings in infrastructure, especially in the poorest countries,
the changes that the virus is undergoing, not to mention the behaviour of some
people, all call for time, diligence, patience, and prudence. These are the
messages that must be stressed.
Uncertainty
is a source of fear, insecurity, and conflict. It is conducive to the emergence
of crazy politicians, who reduce the complexity of facts to two or three
sentences, and solutions to a pair of slogans. That is why we must be vigilant
and combat all forms of demagogy and political lies, which feed all shades of
populism.
(Automatic translation of the opinion piece I published today in the
Diário de Notícias, the old and prestigious Lisbon newspaper)
No comments:
Post a Comment