On
Friday, the EU leaders will meet in Brussels. This will be the first
face-to-face meeting since the beginning of the pandemic. The agenda is about
money, lots of it. They must decide if they approve the Commission’s recovery
proposal, its budget, and the disbursement modalities. It is indeed a delicate
agenda
There
are two camps. One side wants the new money to flow to each country, with
little interference from either the Commission or the Council. In their views,
it is up to the national governments to decide on the programmes and projects
to be funded, accepting however that those funding decisions must fall within
the broad framework proposed by the European Commission. Italy, France, Spain,
and Portugal are within this group.
The
other side, led by the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, advocates a greater
oversight by the European Council. That would mean that country allocations
should be endorsed by all, not just by the government concerned. It would give
the Council, where the heads of State and government sit or are represented,
the authority to say no a country’s allocation plan. They do not see this
approach as interference. They think that the volume of money is very substantial,
and it should, therefore, be used not only for recovery but also for economic and
administrative reform at the national level.
As
of today, it is unclear what the outcome of the summit might be. The conflicting
positions show that some countries are convinced that others are not doing
enough in terms of economic transparency and administrative effectiveness. They
see a widening gap between development levels. And they are afraid that the
richer part of Europe will be asked to keep contributing to States that are not
doing their best in terms of political performance. The opposing side considers
such a position as a prejudiced view. In my opinion, both groups of countries have
some valid points that must be discussed. Indeed, it is time to discuss the
reasons for poor performance and also some of the prevailing national prejudices
that are still alive in different parts of the European Union.
No comments:
Post a Comment