Election day, with confusion at the door
Victor Angelo
Writing
about the American elections, while voting is going on, is risky. Despite the
opinion polls, you never know what will come out of the ballot boxes.
Especially this time, when everything is different, namely the high turnout by
post and in person, which has reached unprecedented levels, the uncertainty as
to what will happen in eight or nine states which may fall to one side or the
other, and the extreme radicalisation of important segments of the electorate.
With Donald Trump in the field, the rules and analysis schemes of the past are
completely muddled.
But
it may be less risky to write now than tomorrow when only part of the results is
known and postal vote counts have not yet been completed. Except for miracles,
and they sometimes happen, tomorrow begins the confusion. In fact, I fear that
in the aftermath of the 3rd of November a period of great pandemonium will
arise in the USA. If my prediction is right, we will get into a mess in which
it will be difficult to have a clear idea about the future. Writing about this
situation of political and social chaos will require a clear-sightedness that
far exceeds my ability to navigate in tormenting waters. Those who know
American society well think that the storm that is coming is simply terrifying.
The
plot has been in preparation for weeks. There is a plan, nothing happens by
chance. The head of the production and prima donna is Donald Trump. As usual,
everything revolves around his megalomania, narcissism, and personal interests.
The
tragedy may unfold more or less in the following way. Once the results of the
day have been calculated, of those who voted in person today, and if these
provisional figures are in his favour, President Trump will come on television
to proclaim himself the winner. He will say that the votes by post, which have
not yet been counted, are not valid. He will thus be trying to ignore the will
of millions of Americans who have chosen the safer postal route in these times
of pandemic to express their choice. Such a statement about the invalidity of
votes not yet counted, if it happens, would be a colossal abuse of power, an
illegality and contrary to democratic practices. But the proclamation of Trump
will immediately bring his supporters to the streets of the cities of the
United States to celebrate the false victory. More than extemporaneous and
unjustified celebrations, these demonstrations of radicalised and armed people
- this has been a record year in terms of the private acquisition of weapons of
all calibres - will serve to intimidate the rest of the citizens. I do not know
what the response of the democrats or the police forces will be. But I have no
doubt that we will see numerous confrontations. A former colleague of mine, a
New Yorker who, like me, oversaw several complicated elections in various parts
of the world, told me yesterday that she is more afraid of this post-election
period in the US than of anything she has seen in the dictatorships she has
been through.
Let
us continue the plot. In the days that follow, Donald Trump will continue to
speak out against the electoral process and not to accept a verdict from the
ballot box that would be unfavourable to him. The political and social
confusion will then be joined by a whole series of legal challenges, which the
President's lawyers will set in motion everywhere. We will then enter a phase
of general upheaval. In such a situation and with the character we have, it
will be Donald Trump who will end up imposing himself. It is true that the
institutions of counterweight and balance of power are a guarantor of democracy
and they exist in the USA. But it is also true that the president has managed
to have 220 federal judges and three for the Supreme Court confirmed during his
term. These judges will be able to play a key role in the legal game ahead.
The
scenario I describe here is obviously pessimistic. To plan the appropriate
response, one must be pessimistic at times of major crisis. It would be great
if it did not happen or if it happened only in a mitigated way. I would very
much like to be wrong. But seeing the shop windows in downtown Washington or
New York being protected with timber panes makes me more convinced that there
is reason to fear and be prepared for the worst.
That
brings me back to our side of the planet. If there is institutional upheaval in
the US, the shock waves will have a destabilising global impact. The
coronavirus pandemic has already turned much of the world upside down. An
additional shock will further complicate the international scene. Are we, here
in Europe, prepared to respond to a possible serious US political crisis?
If
the above scenario occurs, we will see intense diplomatic pressure from Donald
Trump's representatives in European capitals. They will do everything they can
to ensure that this so-called victory is recognised. They will need to show the
American people that European leaders recognise their boss's victory. This is a
way of adding legitimacy to their claim. On these occasions, when elections are
free and acceptable, heads of state have a protocol obligation to send their
congratulations to the winning candidate. We shall see who does so, within the
European Union. At the moment, out of a total of twenty-seven member states, I
count between seven and nine leaders who, if they could, would vote for Trump.
What position will they take in the event of an election mess? And what will
Charles Michel's position be? What kind of relations can be expected between
the two sides of the Atlantic in a second term that would be tainted by a
markedly dubious legitimacy? These questions provide a backdrop to long
discussions. Let us hope that it will not be necessary to return to them in a
while.
In
the meantime, beyond the European position, I am also concerned about the
impact of such a crisis on the future of the United Nations and the
multilateral system. Like the European leaders, António Guterres will also be
under pressure. What message of congratulations can you send to a president if
he emerges from confusion, abuse of institutional power and legal games?
In
these unique times, there is no doubt that the best solution is a clear victory
by Joe Biden.
(AI translation of today’s text I publish in the Portuguese magazine
Visão)
No comments:
Post a Comment