Wednesday 29 December 2010

Chad on its own

This evening I had a brief discussion with the Chadian leadership. They think the international community is not doing enough to assist the country on the road to peace and progress. They also believe Chad has been a barrier against the expansion of religious fundamentalism in the Sahel but that role is not fully appreciated by the key donor countries in the West.

Chad is again at a critical juncture, with the situation in South Sudan having an impact on the fragile relations between Chadians, Northerners and Southerners. Furthermore, the country is preparing for presidential and parliamentary elections, which should take place within the first semester of 2011. The preparatory work is of poor quality and nobody seems to link that with the potential for troubles down the line. On top of everything, one cannot forget that the democratisation process is still an infant.

The donors are not properly represented in N'Djaména and the dialogue between them and the government is not productive. There has been no real dialogue with Brussels either.

France, the key Western partner, has been without a proper ambassador for several months. The outgoing envoy said good bye at the beginning of summer and then, after a short while in Paris, came back, in a very strange diplomatic situation. He is around but as a weakened player.

The EC has been represented by someone who has little sense of diplomacy and a very unique way of looking at strategy. He was supposed to leave long back, but has delayed his departure. He is not happy with the parking lot that waits for him in Brussels. And the new lady keeps waiting somewhere in the clouds of EU bureaucracy.

The US had a good ambassador in N'Djaména. But he has been sick since the beginning of the year. The new ambassador has only recently been confirmed. The interim chargé d'affaires did a good job, but it is not the same as being the susbtantive head of mission.

And that's very much it, on the side of Western missions in Chad.

The question is then obvious: Are we sure we have our African priorities right?

No comments: