Humanism: what does it mean?

 Bring back a humanist approach

Modern global relations are increasingly marked by force and extremism, echoing past nationalist conflicts that marginalized citizens and prioritized elite interests. Despite progress made since World War II in human rights and international law, these values are now under threat, replaced by instability, selfishness, and disregard for cooperation. A renewed humanism, emphasizing solidarity, dignity, and respect for all life, including nature and future generations, is essential to address these challenges. This humanism also calls for ethical use of technology and education fostering critical and ethical thinking to ensure a balanced and sustainable future.

Resurgence of force and extremism: Current international and national politics show a return to aggressive nationalism and elite-driven conflicts, sidelining citizens' rights and dignity.

Erosion of post-war human rights progress: The advances made through the UN and international law in the last eight decades are increasingly ignored, leading to instability and selfish interests dominating global relations.

New humanism for the future: This approach extends beyond human freedom and progress to include respect for all living beings, environmental protection, ethical resource use, and responsible AI application.

Multilateral cooperation and ethical education: Strengthening international organizations, promoting universal ethical values, and fostering critical, ethical education are vital to prevent civilizational decline and ensure sustainable coexistence.

Poor Sri Lanka

This Easter Sunday has been a sad day for humanity. In Sri Lanka, barbarians planned and executed a series of terrorist attacks against innocent people in churches and hotels. Scores died and many were wounded. And the country itself, still trying to find peace after so many years of a tragic civil war, has also seen its image being seriously affected. Everyone should express deep shock and strong condemnation of such violence.

EU Budget: too long a period at a time of uncertainties

I should write about the EU budget 2014-2020, as approved today by the EU Council. And add that even if the total amount matters, what matters more is how money is allocated. How much money goes for the big issues that have a strategic impact over the future of Europe? That’s the key question.

And what are those issues?

First, those related to the economic disparities between different corners of the European space. How can we unite the Continent when some countries and regions are kept far behind in terms of development and the gap keeps increasing?

Second, investments in science and technological research. The future of Europe has to be built on a knowledge economy, not on steel and textiles. Unless, of course, if the textiles are at the sharp end of the creative industries, both in terms of design and advanced materials…

Third, funds and programmes for youth employment promotion, youth education for the jobs of the future, preparing a youth with a European mind-set and a global outlook.  

Fourth, internal security, including cyber-security, and security co-operation with the neighbours of the EU.

Fifth, a common external policy, including an effective development aid agenda and enough resources for humanitarian relief and response.

These are the budget lines we need to look at, as a matter of priority.

Having said that, I am also very concerned about a process that approves financial resources for a long period of time – seven years – when we live in a world that is changing rapidly. It is good to have a long term vision but it is better to have a system that is flexible and can be adjusted to respond to new challenges as they develop. I do not think the EU budgetary process is tailored for that.