Showing posts with label cyber security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cyber security. Show all posts
Tuesday, 28 October 2025
Thursday, 4 April 2019
NATO days
NATO
is seventy years old. It remains a unique type of organisation. Including
because it brings together two very distinct ways of looking at geopolitics and
is based on an ambiguous relationship between the political and military
spheres of power.
Today,
it operates in a very different world. And it is confronted with a complete new
set of challenges. In all its organisational complexity, NATO has changed quite a bit during the last ten years or so. It
has tried to adapt.
But, in my opinion, it has not deserved the attention it should from the political leaders. Most of the political statements and positions on NATO are just ready-made, repetitive and half-baked declarations. That is not very strategic.
But, in my opinion, it has not deserved the attention it should from the political leaders. Most of the political statements and positions on NATO are just ready-made, repetitive and half-baked declarations. That is not very strategic.
Friday, 2 March 2018
Putin´s words
Vladimir Putin´s
speech on weapons and new missile systems, including the repeated reference to nuclear
means, cannot be taken lightly. The Russian President is very strategic when it
comes to his public presentations. And yesterday he was clear. He sees the West
as deeply hostile to Russia and engaged in a campaign against Putin himself. He
believes in what he says, I would add. And he wants us to know he is ready to respond.
We might disagree
with his assessment of the West´s intentions. But we must be prepared for all kinds
of confrontations. Particularly against cyber-attacks, the most immediate threat
coming from his side. He is investing heavily on those attacks. And he is targeting
the countries that matter. The big ones. That´s why we witnessed a major cyberattack
against Germany in the last two days.
Tuesday, 13 December 2016
On cyber as a weapon
Cyber attacks,
when organised by an adversary State, must be taken very seriously and
considered as a new type of armed aggression. Particularly when matters on national
sovereignty and critical institutions are the target. To be soft on that will
open the door for more daring and more damaging hostility. Better be clear and
firm. The challenging State must be undoubtedly made aware of the consequences such
attacks might bring on its own national interests and on its leadership.
Friday, 25 September 2015
Obama and Xi
Excellent speech by President Obama on the occasion of the Chinese President´s visit to the White House. He said the right things about cyber security, human rights, peace and cooperation in Asia and the economic ties between the two countries.
I am sure that President Xi Jinping, who is an astute and experienced player, will reflect about what Obama has said. And his first take will be about respect. Xi might not have liked what he heard but he will recognise that the current US President is a man of courage. And my experience tells me that a genuine leader appreciates courage in politics. It is actually a rare commodity, as many prefer an opportunistic approach.
Not Obama.
I am sure that President Xi Jinping, who is an astute and experienced player, will reflect about what Obama has said. And his first take will be about respect. Xi might not have liked what he heard but he will recognise that the current US President is a man of courage. And my experience tells me that a genuine leader appreciates courage in politics. It is actually a rare commodity, as many prefer an opportunistic approach.
Not Obama.
Thursday, 9 July 2015
BRICS and the cyber disputes
As
the BRICS summit comes to an end, one could see that “internet governance” was a
major issue very much present in the informal discussions.
Russia is
particularly concerned by the fact that the Domain Name System (DNS) is
entirely managed by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN.
This Corporation is a US-based entity and it therefore follows the
North-American legal rules. For Vladimir Putin this is seen as a strategic risk.
He was
very much counting on India´s support to gradually create an alternative system, but
Prime Minister Modi is not ready for a move that would jeopardise his relations
with Washington. India wants to be a key player in the world´s digital economy
but in very clear terms: India sees itself as a service centre for customers
all over the planet. And
they know that the US can become the most important market for the Indian expertise.
Labels:
Brazil,
BRICS,
China,
cyber security,
ICANN,
India,
internet,
Modi,
Putin,
Russia,
South Africa,
Ufa,
world affairs
Friday, 8 February 2013
EU Budget: too long a period at a time of uncertainties
I should write about the EU budget 2014-2020, as approved
today by the EU Council. And add that even if the total amount matters, what
matters more is how money is allocated. How much money goes for the big issues
that have a strategic impact over the future of Europe? That’s the key
question.
And what are those issues?
First, those related to the economic disparities between
different corners of the European space. How can we unite the Continent when
some countries and regions are kept far behind in terms of development and the
gap keeps increasing?
Second, investments in science and technological research.
The future of Europe has to be built on a knowledge economy, not on steel and
textiles. Unless, of course, if the textiles are at the sharp end of the
creative industries, both in terms of design and advanced materials…
Third, funds and programmes for youth employment promotion,
youth education for the jobs of the future, preparing a youth with a European mind-set
and a global outlook.
Fourth, internal security, including cyber-security, and
security co-operation with the neighbours of the EU.
Fifth, a common external policy, including an effective development
aid agenda and enough resources for humanitarian relief and response.
These are the budget lines we need to look at, as a matter
of priority.
Having said that, I am also very concerned about a process
that approves financial resources for a long period of time – seven years –
when we live in a world that is changing rapidly. It is good to have a long
term vision but it is better to have a system that is flexible and can be
adjusted to respond to new challenges as they develop. I do not think the EU budgetary
process is tailored for that.
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
A reference report on Cyber Security
The Commons Defence Committee of the UK's Parliament just released its report on Defence and Cyber-Security. It is a document that should be read carefully.
In the report it is said the cyber threat to UK security could evolve at "almost unimaginable speed". The Committee questions whether the Government has the capacity to deal with it.
It is available at the following sites:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmdfence/106/106.pdf
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmdfence/106/106vw.pdf
In the report it is said the cyber threat to UK security could evolve at "almost unimaginable speed". The Committee questions whether the Government has the capacity to deal with it.
It is available at the following sites:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmdfence/106/106.pdf
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201213/cmselect/cmdfence/106/106vw.pdf
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)