There
are several areas of the UN´s work that call for reform. Today, I would mention
the Protection of Civilians in relation with the mandates of peacekeeping
operations. The reason I raise this issue derives from the report the Center
for Civilians in Conflict, a Washington based NGO, just published on the recent
dramatic events in South Sudan. Basically, the report states that the UN Blue
Helmets did not move out of their barracks and therefore neglected to protect
the humanitarian workers. Several of these workers became then victims of
extreme violence at the hands of the national soldiers, governmental and rebels
alike.
These
facts are accurate. The truth of the matter is however much more complex. The
UN troops had no means to confront the heavily armed South Sudanese fighters.
The UN weapons disadvantage was a crying one. And the fighters were simply
determined to shoot and kill the UN Blue Helmets, in case the latter would
become too visible on the streets.
These
raises a very good number of fundamental questions about deploying a UN
peacekeeping force where there is no peace to keep. Should the UN be there? Was
the Security Council right when approving the mandate for the South Sudan mission?
Should we envisage an international fighting force first, for an initial intervention?
How should we put together such a combat mission?
There
are indeed many questions just on this issue. And this just one of the many issues
that call for serious rethinking.
No comments:
Post a Comment