Showing posts with label Lao Zi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lao Zi. Show all posts

Saturday, 17 January 2026

Lao Zi, founder of Taoism, reacts to Nietzsche's and my views: an imaginary letter

 If Nietzsche represents the Will to Power and Gandhi the Will to Truth, Lao Zi, the founder of Taoism, born in China in 531 a.C., represents the Will to Flow.

From the perspective of Taoism, the "death" of an international order is neither a tragedy nor a triumph of the strong (as Nietzsche might see it). It is simply the natural result of a system that became too rigid, too heavy, and too far removed from the Tao (the Way).

Here is how Lao Zi might respond to my correspondence:




From the Banks of the Nameless River

To the Honorable Weaver of Nets, Victor,

You write with great concern about a "shattered stage" and the "death of order." You are like a man who stands by a frozen river in mid-winter and laments that the water has stopped moving. And your friend, the German with the hammer, is like a man who wants to smash the ice with a heavy blow to prove he is stronger than the cold.

Both of you fail to see the river.

You call the "International Order" a cathedral. I tell you it was a dam. For eighty years, you tried to hold back the Great Current with walls of paper, treaties, and ink. You thought that if you wrote enough laws, the world would stop being the world. But the nature of the Tao is to flow. When a dam becomes too rigid, it does not "perish"—it simply breaks because it can no longer yield. This is not the end of the world; it is the water returning to its path.

You speak of Political Nihilism. You fear the "law of the strongest." But tell me: does the oak tree fear the wind? The oak is stiff and strong, and so it snaps. The willow is soft and yielding, and so it survives. You seek "Strategic Autonomy" and "Coordinated Defense." You want to build a bigger, stiffer oak. I tell you: the more you sharpen the blade, the sooner it will grow blunt. The more you amass gold and weapons, the more you invite the thief.

You look to Davos and seek a "Spirit of Dialogue." Why so much noise? Why so many words? When the mouth is open, the heart is often closed. You sign an Agreement in Paraguay and call it a bridge. If the bridge is made of genuine need, it will stand. If it is made of cleverness and grasping, it will wash away in the first storm.

Nietzsche speaks of the Abyss. I speak of the Valley. The abyss is a place of falling; the valley is a place of life. Do not try to "overcome" the vacuum with your will. Empty yourself of your plans, your "paradigms," and your "architectures." A vessel is useful only because of the emptiness inside it.

The world is not a thing to be "managed." It is a living spirit that cannot be interfered with. If you try to fix it, you will ruin it. If you try to grasp it, you will lose it.

You say the world is a "perilous place." It has always been so. But the peril lies not in the "Kremlin's and other forces," but in your own refusal to be like water. Water does not struggle against the rock; it flows around it, and in time, the rock is gone and the water remains.

Stop trying to reconstruct the dam. Instead, learn to swim in the river.

With a quiet heart,

Lao Zi



I cannot disagree more with Nietzsche's views

I entirely disagree with Friedrich Nietzsche's response to my letter. In general, his response is rife with an objectionable and dominant white masculinity. It justifies brutality through the ages, an idea that is completely contrary to my message to him. It is a myth to assert that human nature is inherently violent, as he assumes and states.  

If the law of the strongest indeed defines whatever we take human nature to be, then the world would have ceased to exist a long time ago. Rather, the history of humanity is more so defined by cooperation and collaboration, when seen over the long term. Violence and war have always captured the human imagination in disproportionate ways. Why? What interests does it serve? Not those of the general survival of the species, that's for sure. 

Dialogue is an essential tool of understanding. It is essential to the sociality of human beings. It is key to resolve conflict without violence. I fully condemn Nietzsche's assertion that "dialogue is the refuge of those who no longer have the strength to command". As I underline that dialogue must always be civilized. 

The exclamation he makes by saying "How British!" is unacceptable. Such a comment can easily be construed as a deep seated form of prejudice. It has no place in my way of seeing the world. 

He says that "the death of an old god is always the birth of a new freedom". It is a very limited view of history and I cannot endorse it. The death of an old order can give way to greater tyranny and repression. This seems to be the current trend and I have shown I am very worried as I see such a trend become a reality in some parts of the world. 

Optimism is not "a drink for the weak". It is the only way forward in a creative process that is profoundly needed. 

I have imagined what could be the responses from a non-Eurocentric and supremacist view. I will publish in separate post two imaginary letters: one from Mahatma Gandhi and another one from Lao Zi, born in China in 571 a.C. and founder of Taoism religious philosophy. 

They bring in views that demolish Nietzsche's.