I have been asked that question, but
I try not to respond to it. And then, they ask it again, my opinion about which
country is likely to gain from the current dreadful crisis, in terms of
geopolitics and dominance. They want me to say China, others they expect me to mention
the possibility of an open confrontation between China and the US, and some
people are ready for an answer that would foretell the end of the European
Union. All this is very negative. There will competition after the crisis, as
there has been before it, but I think it is too far-fetched to predict war or
the demise of the EU.
Competition aside, the crisis
underlines the need for a greater level of international cooperation and
complementarity among the nations. We live in an extremely interconnected world,
as we can see from the expansion of the pandemic to every corner of the planet.
Unfortunately, some leaders are not getting the message. They have decided to
fight a global threat through erecting national barriers. My hope is that this
will be challenged once the crisis is over and that we will be able to make it
clear that it is better to cooperate. That is certainly a debate that must take
place at that time. We should not go back to the past.
Competition has been the model. We must
go beyond that. Call it history. As we look into the future and learn from
today’s difficulties and consider the next challenges, including the
environmental one, we should be moving towards a new stage, that will put the
emphasis on joint action and human cohesion. That could be one of the positive
results of the present-day drama. It is idealistic, I accept the observation,
but we must base ourselves on new dreams.
No comments:
Post a Comment