The
Syrian Geneva process is clearly owned and directed by foreigners: the US, Russia, Saudi Arabia
and somehow the UN, through its Special Envoy. The Syrian side – the many
parties to the conflict – are sitting in the margins or squarely outside, far
out. They are not committed to the process, one should add. And if that is the
case I do not see how such an exercise can achieve any meaningful and durable
results.
Showing posts with label Geneva talks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Geneva talks. Show all posts
Tuesday, 3 May 2016
Tuesday, 26 April 2016
Obama and the four EU leaders: a comment
President
Obama, on the last day of his visit to Germany, met with Angela Markel, David
Cameron, François Hollande and Matteo Renzi. In my opinion, he should have
invited Donald Tusk as well. This would have added strength to his speeches
about the EU´s relevance. Words are important and the President said the right
ones. But he missed the opportunity to show he means business when supporting
Europe´s unity.
The
meeting lasted two hours. Most of the time was spent on the situation in Syria,
including the positions that should be taken regarding the Geneva negotiating
process, which is now out of the rails, and the fight against the Islamic State
terrorists. On the latter, it is clear the IS has been losing ground. There is
less money available, less volunteer fighters, and greater military pressure on
them. The additional deployment of 250 US Special Forces, announced moments
before the meeting by Obama, is also a significant development in combatting
the terrorists. I hope the Germans in particular will also increase their
contribution to the ground operations.
The
rest of the meeting focussed on Libya. Italy and the UK are most likely to
intensify their support to the recognised Libyan Prime Minister. And in
addition, we should see more naval patrols off the Libyan coast soon. There are
some differences of opinion about the nature of such maritime task force:
should it be a NATO-led force or should it be an expansion of the current
EU-sponsored naval presence? In any case, the maritime effort should be a
supporting one to the actions on the ground inside Libya. The priority is on
land and that means stabilising the situation in that North African country.
Saturday, 6 February 2016
Aleppo
The
Russian forces deployed in Syria are now focussed on getting the city of Aleppo
and its surrounding areas under Assad´s control. That´s were their current main
effort is. Not on the Islamic State terrorists. As they do that, tens of
thousands of people move out of the area and try to seek refuge in Turkey. This
gives the Russians another reason to go for Aleppo: it ends up by increasing
the pressure on the Turks. And, as we know, the Russians have an axe to grind
with Turkey. This is a way of doing it. All this aggravates the geopolitical
tensions and makes a political solution even more remote. Actually, at this
stage I see almost no chance to get the Geneva talks back on the agenda. The
bet seems, once again, to be on a military response to an inhumane chaotic
situation.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)