The hostage situation in Algeria, with the kidnapping of many
foreigners, from different nationalities, by an al-Qaeda inspired group, opens
a new phase in the security crisis in that part of North Africa as well as
other areas surrounding Mali. All of sudden governments from outside the region
are realising that their interests in the gas and oil fields in Algeria and the
vicinity could be under very serious threat. This can deeply affect the
functioning of the many fields and lead to a significant decrease in the
production levels.
Wednesday, 16 January 2013
French pessimism
Quoting from today's Eurointelligence daily bulletin:
French more pessimistic about the future
According to the annual poll of Opinionway cited by Les Echos the French are more pessimistic than ever about their future, hardly believe that the young will do better than their parents, and that the politicians can handle the crisis or do anything about their concerns.
66% of the polled prefer experts rather than politicians to decide on what is best for the country, while 46% believe that France has to protect itself against today’s world. Only hospitals (82%) and the police (62%) have the confidence of the polled. There is also one surprising result: 53% want the state to give companies more freedom, and the private company is the only organisation which gains in confidence.
Tuesday, 15 January 2013
Mali, Algeria and the EU
The events in Mali, especially the French deployment, have
brought that part of the world back to the agenda in Brussels and other EU
capitals. This is good news because there was no way the West African states
alone – even with some “technical support” from a couple of external partners –
could be in a position to put together a military force capable of fighting the
rebel groups operating in Northern Mali. Most of West Africa has very weak
armies, with poor operational capabilities. Therefore, and taking into account
the seriousness of the challenge, European countries and other nations have to
be ready for a UN-sponsored robust peacekeeping operation in Mali. That’s the
way forward.
It is also part of way forward to ask a very simple
question: who is providing fuel, spares, and vital supplies to the extremists
in Northern Mali? People who deal with these matters have the answer, I am
sure. Maybe the answer is just on the other side of the Northern border. Once
this question is answered in enough evidence has been collected, I think the
key leaders in the EU should confront their political counterparts in the
country concerned and firmly request them to put a stop to those logistical
lines of supply. That would contribute a long way to a negotiated solution of
the national crisis in Mali.
Sunday, 13 January 2013
Paris is diverse
There was a very large demonstration in Paris today against
the adoption of legislation that would recognise the marriage between people of
the same sex. I disagree with the position adopted by the demonstrators. But
applaud those who have the commitment and courage to fight for their views and
values. Strong societies are made of people who are not afraid of expressing their
opinion. They are also made of people
who accept the views and behaviour of others who might have opted for a
different approach to life.
Tolerance and inclusiveness are key dimensions of today’s
democracies.
Saturday, 12 January 2013
Mali
President Hollande’s decision to send troops to Mali should
be fully supported. It is time to stop the armed men that are trying to destroy
the country’s fragile institutions and peaceful, tolerant way of life the
Malians have gotten used to.
Those men are just fighters without a cause, hiding behind a
very simple and brutal way of looking at religion. They come from an old
tradition of razzias combined with the lack of economic opportunities in a vast
arid area. For years, their leaders and many of them served Kaddafi’s dreams of
an African legion. This was a great source of money, weapons and military
training, even if substandard.
The West African nations are in no position to militarily
oppose these raiders. These are countries with very weak, ineffectual armies.
To believe they can put together a credible force and fight the radicals from Northern
Mali is a serious mistake. Furthermore, these armies have no training to combat
in desert areas. For these reasons, a larger support, from France and
elsewhere, is a must.
And the UN needs to reconsider its position and be real
about what can be done and who can do it in Mali. The French and other nations from the broader international community can.
Labels:
Bamako,
Europe,
France,
Hollande,
Kaddafi,
Mali,
terrorism,
UN,
United Nations,
West Africa
Leaders
"Be not afraid of greatness: some are born great, some achieve greatness, and some have greatness thrust upon them."
William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
Friday, 11 January 2013
EU Leaders neglect job promotion issues
In my opinion column of yesterday in the Portuguese weekly
magazine Visao , I concluded that the only way in the European Union to bring confidence
back is through lower unemployment rates.
The European citizens perceive the
leaders as too concerned with the survival of the banks, the austerity measures
and the usual power games. They do not see the same level of political energy
being invested in promoting jobs, attracting investment and expanding exports.
For the citizen on the street, the politicians seem to be disconnected from the
ordinary person. This translates into a crisis of confidence in the political
classes. In many countries, the credibility of the political leaders is rather
comparable to a used car vendor’s image.
If there is no improvement in the job market, the leaders’credibility
will remain low. If I were in charge, I would spend most of my time looking for
sustainable solutions to the unemployment issue. And I would certainly start by
focussing my attention on the exchange value of the Euro. A strong Euro is an
important contributing factor for continued job losses.
Thursday, 10 January 2013
The Portuguese kindergarten
The IMF has just published a review of Portugal’s public
expenditures. The report came as a bomb at a time when the public debate about
2013 State budget had already generated an avalanche of political fights and
great instability, including within the governing parties. Now, with the IMF’s recommendations on the table, the
country looks like a big fire being dealt with gasoline. There is widespread
cacophony, exaltation and very little self-examination and reflection. It is like a kindergarten without any adult in charge.
UK's national interest and the EU
From today's Financial Times:
Britain needs to adopt a hard-headed approach founded on the national interest – and hold a referendum
I love the idea of "national interest". But I am afraid it is one of the vaguest ideas on the market. It is subject to so many interpretations. The "national interest" as perceived by a banker in London is very different from the one understood by a shop floor vendor in Birmingham, or a a young graduate in Durham. Not to mention people in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland. Even a staff writer at the Financial Times will see it differently from a journo at The Sun next door.
Is there a good step-by-step guideline on how to define the "national interest" of a given country? I don't think so. But in a case like this one, the future of the relationship between the UK and Europe cannot just be defined by Conservative politicians or by a coalition government that is above all a marriage of convenience. It would require ample debate at Westminster and a broad consensus in the Commons.
Britain needs to adopt a hard-headed approach founded on the national interest – and hold a referendum
I love the idea of "national interest". But I am afraid it is one of the vaguest ideas on the market. It is subject to so many interpretations. The "national interest" as perceived by a banker in London is very different from the one understood by a shop floor vendor in Birmingham, or a a young graduate in Durham. Not to mention people in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland. Even a staff writer at the Financial Times will see it differently from a journo at The Sun next door.
Is there a good step-by-step guideline on how to define the "national interest" of a given country? I don't think so. But in a case like this one, the future of the relationship between the UK and Europe cannot just be defined by Conservative politicians or by a coalition government that is above all a marriage of convenience. It would require ample debate at Westminster and a broad consensus in the Commons.
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
Europe and Russia
Yesterday’s discussion on European defence at the Madariaga Foundation
left out the issue of Russia. Nobody mentioned Russia, either during the
presentations or the discussions.
I found it difficult to understand, particularly
when we see the positions President Putin takes towards the West. I know there is a NATO partnership with
Moscow. But I also suspect that the partnership is not going well at all and
that the trend is to face an Eastern neighbour that sees itself more as a competitor
than a partner.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)