At a time of great uncertainties, the key responsibility of
a political leader is to minimize potential risks and bring tranquility to the
minds of the citizens. To contribute to further instability, uncontrollable perils
and to the loss of economic opportunities is bad leadership. Even when moral
values and principles are on the line, the point is to respond to those
challenges within the law and rules that can be accepted by the larger number
of people. To go alone on politics is the best way to increase the risk and to
find oneself on the wrong side of the solution.
Friday, 6 September 2013
Thursday, 5 September 2013
A very complex environment around President Obama's choice
As we reach the end of today, we notice that the
President Obama’s military option is losing momentum in the US House of
Representatives and also in the American and European public opinions. It is
become a tough call for the President.
In addition, Pope Francis's letter to the G20 leaders cannot
be easily dismissed. The Pope reminds all of us that there is no alternative
to the crisis but through dialogue and that a military intervention will make things
much more difficult.
All this is creating an environment that will be deeply
against the strikes once they take place. President Obama – and François Hollande as well – will have to deal with the consequences in and around Syria,
plus with the citizens’ views in their respective countries. This will transform
any military action into a political
challenge of great complexity. It will open many unknown avenues.
Wednesday, 4 September 2013
Lottery and Assad
Now we know the Damascus official explanation. It runs
basically along the following lines:
- Saudi Arabia and Western intelligence agencies have given chemical weapons to their friends the rebels;
- The point was for the rebels to make use of them the day the UN inspectors were to start their visit and get the blame on the Assad government;
- The fellows tried to shoot them from the suburbs they controlled but they were so inept - amateurs, the government said - that they could not send them across to the regime soldiers and to the areas under government control;
- They kept trying, those amateur rebels, and the more they tried the more they failed and people around them, women and children, not only men, just kept dying in droves.
Labels:
Assad,
chemical weapons,
CIA,
France,
intelligence,
Middle East,
Saudi Arabia,
Syria,
UK,
US
Tuesday, 3 September 2013
Poor minds, strong wills
I watched today’s hearing on Syria and have to say that I
was not particularly impressed by the Senators that raised the questions. They
obviously lacked a strategic view of the issue and a very limited understanding
of the Middle East and the European capabilities –which are very small, when it
comes to the ability to strike in a foreign land like Syria.
John Kerry, on the other side of the table, was much more
strategic. He was able to contain his contempt for some of the questions. Only
in one occasion he was about to go beyond a restrained approach.
General Dempsey, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
was also very professional. I wonder what he thought of some the Senators’
interventions. Not much, I guess. These military top guys have a very low
opinion about the professional politicians.
In any case, it seems now clear that the Congress will
approve President Obama’s resolution on Syria. For a “limited and narrow”
campaign, it is said. But nobody knows what that means. And moreover, in this
type of affairs everything starts small as the plan is to achieve the expected
results within days. Experience has shown that it never happens that way. One
knows when it starts, but no one knows how it will move on.
Monday, 2 September 2013
Rajoy's strange neighborhood policy
Mariano Rajoy of Spain has added a new international tension
to his conflict with the UK over Gibraltar. This time is with Portugal. He has
instructed his Permanent Mission in New York to send a Note Verbale to the UN
Secretariat stating that Spain considers the Selvagens Islands, an archipelago
South of Madeira Island and on the way to Canary Islands, as a mere collection
of rocks. And for that reason, Spain cannot accept any Portuguese claim over
the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) around the Selvagens.
This position is touching a sensitive chord in Portuguese
history. There has been, in the past, for many centuries, a strong anti-Spanish
patriotic feeling. This feeling has been seriously attenuated during the last
two decades, but it is still there. It is never a good idea to kick the
sleeping dog.
Sunday, 1 September 2013
G20 and Syria
Syria continues to occupy the front pages. It will also be the key matter on the table at the G20 meeting this week in St. Petersburg on 5 and 6 September. It is not on the agenda but it will dominate the discussions. President Obama's decision to strike Syria will be the ghost in the room. The fact that he is delaying any action until the following week will give some space for diplomatic consultations. But it will certainly not change the positions of the key players, especially Russia.
In the meantime, one would expect that the UN Secretary-General be prepared by then to share the preliminary conclusions of the inspections with the Security Council members. That would add some substance to the G20 exchanges.
In the meantime, one would expect that the UN Secretary-General be prepared by then to share the preliminary conclusions of the inspections with the Security Council members. That would add some substance to the G20 exchanges.
Labels:
Ban Ki-moon,
Cameron,
France,
G20,
Hollande,
Middle East,
Obama,
Putin,
Russia,
Syria,
UN,
UN Security Council,
US
Friday, 30 August 2013
Kerry on Syria
US State Secretary John Kerry’s statement on Syria was an
excellent piece of work. Brilliant, well thought through and properly grounded.
It is also, in many ways, a seminal moment in terms of foreign policy doctrine.
It will be often quoted in the future.
But, for now, it deserves, above all, unqualified support.
Thursday, 29 August 2013
No time for a greater crisis in the Middle East
Very quietly but very clearly, the big international
business bosses and their friends in the academic and media worlds here in the
EU have been sending the message that a major security crisis in the Middle
East at this time, when the European economies are starting a timid recovery, would
be an extremely bad idea. It is not just the vast and uncontrollable uncertainty
that it will create, not just the impact on oil prices, not just the fact that
existing crisis around the Suez Canal is threatening enough, to mention only a
few of current hot spots. It is all that combined plus the fact that some of
the Middle East countries remain major clients and investors in the EU
economies. It is no time to destabilize them, as well. International commerce
does not want any adventure at this moment.
Wednesday, 28 August 2013
Syria's hell
As things stand, we can expect over the weekend some cruise
missiles to be launched on Syria from war vessels sailing in the Mediterranean
Sea or in the Indian Ocean. In many ways, the rhetoric in Washington, Paris and
London has gone too far. The accusations against Assad on the gas deaths of
last week leave little room for any other option but action by those who
publicly made them. The UN Security Council is being dealt with by the British.
In the international division of labour, they got the assignment. Once it becomes
clear that the Council is not prepared to authorise the use of force by
rejecting the British draft resolution, the unilateral approach will be more
palatable to the Western public opinion.
There are many problems related to military action, in any
case. Even if approved by the Security Council. Once it starts, it opens a new
phase and a box of unintended consequences. This is particularly true in a
corner of the world that is like a tinderbox. Therefore, those who decide to go
for it should be ready for hell. And they should also have a clear end-game
alternative. Unfortunately, experience has shown that we think small and never
prepare for the big and complex situation that will follow.
Labels:
Arab Spring,
Assad,
Brahimi,
Cameron,
conflict management,
France,
Friends of Syria,
Hollande,
Obama,
Security Council,
Syria,
Syrian Opposition Coalition,
UK,
UN Security Council,
US,
war
Thursday, 22 August 2013
Assad is a war criminal
The gas attack against civilians in the suburbs of Damascus
simply reveals how little respect Assad and his circle have for the international
community and in particular for the United Nations. They all know that the UN is divided and that
the just launched international inspection is a mere tooth-less tiger. The many
deaths caused by this unacceptable chemical massacre only serve to remind all
of us that Assad has long become a war criminal with powerful godfathers.
Labels:
Assad,
China,
Damascus,
Friends of Syria,
international affairs,
justice,
Middle East,
Russia,
Security Council,
Syria,
Syrian Opposition Coalition,
United Nations,
United States,
war crimes
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)