This
last day of 2014 marks the end of ISAF, the international military mission in
Afghanistan. The coalition of combat forces, the largest alliance of states for
military purposes in recent history, has been on the ground for 13 years.
Throughout this very long intervention, the human and financial costs were immense.
Many raise questions. Was it worth the investment, the sacrifices of so many?
Was it the best approach to bring together a deeply divided country which had
become a breeding nest for violent extremism and negative model of retrograde
approaches to life in society? Is the current situation that is left in the
hands of the national authorities sustainable? Are we safer at present?
Many
thesis will be written about the international assistance to Afghanistan. But
beyond the academic papers, the model applied in Afghanistan will also
challenge the way we see peace enforcement, international military assistance,
and the relations between key international organisations, nation building and
national leadership issues. The concept of comprehensive response will also
have to be revised. It should include, a few other dimensions, the regional
response. Afghanistan is just the inner circle of much larger storm that
includes the neighbouring countries. Any military response within the smaller
circle can only be effective and sustainable if it goes beyond that circle and
brings together a much wider and multifaceted political response.
Beyond
these substantive and wide-ranging issues, the points today, at the end of
2014, are to remember all those who have fallen during the many years past and
to wish the people of that country and its region a more peaceful 2015. They
dramatically need that type of hope.